Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

428 F.2d 824

Docket No. 24231.

Hymes v. Procunier

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Aug. 10, 1970, Rehearing Denied Sept. 16, 1970.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1970-08-10

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently August 1970

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1970-08-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Stanley A. Weigel, Judge.

Daniel Boone Hymes, in pro. per.

Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen., John T. Murphy, and Timoth G. Laddish, Deputy Attys. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE, District judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

The decision refusing habeas corpus relief is affirmed.

¶2

The district court found that the questions presented had been previously decided and rejected by the same court. Of course, the district court can take judicial notice of its own records, and appellant has not brought forward the records of other petitions.

¶3

Also, we have trouble finding a substantial federal question in the petition.

/428/f2d/824 · .json · Public domain