United States v. Ayers’s Empirical Analysis
428 F.3d 312 · 2005
Citation profile
30 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably United States v. Fernandez (2006), United States v. Gale (2006)
30 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Booker · Chapman v. State of California · Blakely v. Washington · United States v. Crosby · United States v. Garcia-Garcia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e ordinarily presume a district court imposing an alternative non-guidelines sentence took into account all the factors listed in § 3553(a) and accorded them the appropriate significance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“additional mitigating evidence specifically for the court's use in determining his non-guidelines sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“would have been relevant, of course, to the court's analysis under § 3553(a),”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.