Young v. Pollock Engineering Group, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
428 F.3d 786 · 2005
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 2020
9 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Coffman v. Keene Corp. · James A. McKinnon v. Skil Corporation · Bilotta v. Kelley Co., Inc. · Ponticas v. K.M.S. Investments
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]estimony may be excluded if an expert fails to explain how a proposed safety modification would protect the machine's operators without compromising the machine's utility”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the likelihood of harm, and the gravity of harm if it happens, against the burden of the precaution which would be effective to avoid the harm”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.