Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

428 F. App'x 1

Colbert v. Cordray

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided March 31, 2011

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2011-03-31

Relies on Neitzke v. Williams · Vanhorne's Lessee v. Dorrance

Decided 2011-03-31

¶1JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

¶2This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by the appellant. See Fed. RApp. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 340). It is

¶3ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed February 8, 2011, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed appellant’s complaint as frivolous. See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 *2U.S. 319, 325, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989).

¶4Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

/428/fappx/1 · .json · Public domain