Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 428 F. Supp. 39 - Wallace v. Hewitt

428 F. Supp. 39 - Wallace v. Hewitt’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
November 2009
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2009

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

601976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Younger v. Harris · Wolff v. McDonnell · Railroad Commission v. Pullman Co. · Preiser v. Rodriguez · Wood v. Strickland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Extradition Act is inapplicable to persons, such as plaintiff, who are sentenced prisoners in Pennsylvania and who are facing criminal charges in another state which is also a party to the Interstate Agreement on Detainers. The Extradition Act, while containing some language possibly applicable to sentenced prisoners as well, should be construed in light of the Agreement, enacted eighteen years later in 1959.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The rights provided by the Extradition Act make much sense in the case of a person arrested to face charges in another state or in the case of an unsentenced prisoner (who might be put on parole, sentenced to time already served, etc.), but very little sense in the context of a sentenced prisoner, such as plaintiff.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.