Commonwealth v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited
2 district · 24 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Opinions of the Justices to the House of Representatives · Commonwealth v. Durling · Lockhart v. Attorney General · Commonwealth v. Brandano · Commonwealth v. Gordon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Artful nomenclature will not turn a statute authorizing probation into authorization for a continuance ruling. Absent this judicial alchemy, G. L. c. 276, § 87, provides no such authority.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[0]ur decisions uniformly uphold a prosecutor's wide discretion in deciding whether to prosecute a particular defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Worma v. Healey“couple[d] ... with a supervisory element to ensure that the probationer abides by the probationary terms.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.