Dooley v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently April 2000
2 federal appellate · 22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Wade · Simmons v. United States · Neil v. Biggers · Stovall v. Denno · Foster v. California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Once a party opens a subject on cross-examination, it is permissible for the opposing party to pursue that subject on redirect examination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lycan v. State“Harris v. State, (1980) Ind., 403 N.E.2d 327, 329 . The State bears the burden in the trial court of producing”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Johnson v. State“D.D. had made no inaccurate identification of her assailant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dooley v. Duckworth
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.