Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 428 NE2D 1271 - Russell v. State

Russell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 1994
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 401

Relies on Brown v. United States · Craig v. Harney · Exxon Corp. v. Department of Revenue of Wisconsin · In the Matter of Criminal Contempt of Thomas C McConnell · In the Matter of Larry Little

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t is of the utmost importance in a free society that the power to punish for contempt be not misused as in cases when it is utilized to protect the personal or individual feelings of the judge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.