Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 428 NE2D 808 - Pearson v. State

Pearson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 1989
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Turman v. State · 182 Ind. App. 99 - Jamerson v. State · Bullock v. State · 178 Ind. App. 444 - Odore v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the present case does not concern a Parole Board's decision to revoke parole but rather the court's duty to impose a consecutive sentence”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “any possibility of the imposition of consecutive sentences”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.