Moore v. McAlester’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 2016
1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Estate of Heard · Edmands v. Tice · Video Independent Theatres, Inc. v. Walker · Major v. Kammer · Conville v. Bakke
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t is not suggested that other parts of the will require a different meaning, or that the testator was not aware of the true meaning of the phrase.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"After the final decree of adoption is entered, the relation of parent and child and all the rights, duties, and other legal consequences of the natural relation of child and parent shall thereafter exist between the adopted child and the adoptive parents of the child and the kindred of the adoptive parents. From the date of the final decree of adoption, the child shall be entitled to inherit real and personal property from and through the adoptive parents in accordance with the statutes of descent and distribution, and the adoptive parents shall be entitled to inherit real and personal property from and through the child in accordance with said statutes.” (Emphasis supplied)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“to exclude adopted children. The district court had found that the testator had intended to limit the devise of the trust property to the issue of his daughter's body, which would exclude an adopted child of the daughter. The Oklahoma Supreme Court stated that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.