Sullateskee v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““A specific intent is not presumed, and conviction cannot be had on the basis of an imputed intent. The general rule, that a criminal intention will be presumed from the commission of the unlawful act does not apply. No intent-in law or mere legal presumption, differing from the intent in fact, can be allowed to supply the place of proof of the requisite specific intent. 22 C.J.S. Criminal Law § 32.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. McFay v. State