Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 428 PA 201 - Githens, Rexsamer & Co. v. Wildstein

Githens, Rexsamer & Co. v. Wildstein’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
2
states following
May 1995
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently May 1995 · most notably Jones Appeal (1972), Pompa v. Hojnacki (1971)

26 state decisions

2301968197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brandon v. Peoples Natural Gas Co. · Izzi v. Philadelphia Transportation Co. · Commonwealth v. Perdok · Davies v. McDowell National Bank · MacK v. Reading Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘The thing’ which plaintiff contends caused the accident is the motor, which was allegedly improperly fused. This motor and the electrical system in question had been installed and maintained by Penn Jersey, an independent contractor selected by defendants. While this fact would not exonerate defendants from their duties as owners and occupants of the premises, it did nega tive the existence of the requirement that ‘the thing’ which caused the accident be in defendants’ exclusive control.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““A record of an act, condition or event shall,- in so far as relevant, be competent evidence if the custodian or other qualified witness testifies to its identity and the mode of its preparation, and if it was made in the regular course of business at or near the time of the act, condition or event, and if, in the opinion of the court, the sources of information, method and time of preparation were made such as to justify its admission”.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.