Moore v. Diaz’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Shiomos v. STATE EMP. RETIREMENT BD. · Beckert v. Warren · 327 Pa. Super. 99 - Village Beer & Beverage, Inc. v. Vernon D. Cox & Co. · Sweet v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board · 403 Pa. Super. 560 - Schaeffer v. Frey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A chancellor’s findings of fact ... have all the force and effect of a jury’s verdict and will not be disturbed on appeal if there is sufficient evidence to sustain such findings, [citation omitted]. This rule is particularly applicable to findings which are predicated upon the credibility of witnesses, whom the chancellor has had the opportunity to hear and observe, [citation omitted].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.