Pirri v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2001
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · State v. Stevens · 334 So. 2d 671 - State v. Lundy · 378 So. 2d 1294 - State v. Ramos · State v. Amerson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“and that because of the coercive setting and the officer's failure to notify him of his right to refuse the search, his compliance with the request”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“might possibly be deemed acquiescence to authority, but it certainly does not rise to the level of free and voluntary consent to search.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.