Price v. Norris’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 1991
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 343 So. 2d 495 - Pruitt v. Pruitt · Barksdale v. Pendergrass · Locke v. Sparks · 388 So. 2d 891 - Cauley v. Sanders
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"(a) The existence of a dominant, confidential relationship between a favored beneficiary and the testator; and "(b) active interference or undue activity by the beneficiary in procuring the execution of the will." (Emphasis added.) Price v. Norris , 428 So.2d 609 , 610 (Ala. 1983).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.