Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 428 SO2D 621 - Richburg v. Cromwell

Richburg v. Cromwell’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably 710 So. 2d 1276 - Williams v. State (1996), 672 So. 2d 1319 - Dobyne v. State (1994)

34 state decisions

1601983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Rule 10(f), Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure, does allow the record on appeal to be supplemented, but only to include matters which were in evidence at the trial level and inadvertently omitted from the record on appeal. This rule was never intended to allow matter to be included in the record on appeal which was not before the trial court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.