Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 429 A2D 1312 - Hooks v. State

Hooks v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
July 2000
most recently cited

1 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 2000

1 district · 7 state decisions

30198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Townsend v. Burke · Mempa v. Rhay · Green v. United States · United States v. Behrens · Ball v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The norms governing sentencing proceedings are well settled: thus, (1) a defendant has a right to be present at the imposition of final sentence, United States v. Behrens, 375 U.S. 162 , 84 S.Ct. 295 , 11 L.Ed.2d 224 (1963); (2) he has a right to counsel at that time, Mempa v. Rhay, 389 U.S. 128 , 88 S.Ct. 254 , 19 L.Ed.2d 336 (1967); Townsend v. Burke, 334 U.S. 736 , 68 S.Ct. 1252 , 92 L.Ed. 1690 (1948); (3) the Trial Judge is required to address a defendant personally at that time and to ask him if he wishes to make a statement in his own behalf and/or to present any information in mitigation of punishment, Green v. United States, 365 U.S. 301 , 81 S.Ct. 653 , 5 L.Ed.2d 670 (1961); Ball v. United States, 140 U.S. 118 , 11 S.Ct. 761 , 35 L.Ed. 377 (1891). Those norms, whether derived from the common law or constitutionally based, are followed in our practice and are codified in Superior Court Criminal Rules 43 and 32(a). We have no doubt that the imposition of sentence is a critical stage in the proceeding and, for that reason, both defendant and counsel are required to be present. Mempa v. Rhay, supra; United States v. Behrens, supra.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Given the fact that (a) when the original sentences were imposed defendants were in court with counsel and had an opportunity to be heard both personally and through counsel, and that (b) the Trial Judge had no discretion in imposing the life sentences after remand, we find no reversible error in these special circumstances.” Hooks v. State, supra, 429 A.2d at 1314 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Before imposing sentence, the court shall also ... (B) Afford counsel for the defendant an opportunity to speak on behalf of the defendant, and (C) Address the defendant personally and determine if the defendant wishes to make a statement and to present any information in mitigation of the sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.