Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 429 F.2d 1120 - Coleman ex rel. Coleman v. Wagner College

Coleman ex rel. Coleman v. Wagner College’s Empirical Analysis

429 F.2d 1120 · 1970

Citation profile

73
cited by 73 later decisions
3
states following
February 2011
most recently cited

30 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 73 later decisions — most recently February 2011 · most notably 10 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1331, 10 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,294 Selene Weise v. Syracuse University, Jo Davis Mortenson v. Syracuse University (1975), Albert v. Carovano (1988)

30 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions

57019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority · Marsh v. State of Alabama · Smith v. Allwright · Public Utilities Commission v. Pollak · Griffin v. State of Maryland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] reasonable and widespread belief among college administrators ... that section 6450 required them to adopt a particular stance toward campus demonstrators would seem to justify a conclusion that the state intended for them to pursue that course of action.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “section 6450 represents a meaningful state intrusion into the disciplinary policies of private colleges and universities.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the 'regulation' of college discipline embodied in section 6450 appears almost devoid of meaningful content.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.