Naugle v. Oklahoma’s Empirical Analysis
429 F.2d 1268 · 1970
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Georgia v. Rachel · City of Greenwood v. Peacock · Bohlander v. Independent School District Number One of Tulsa County · Naugle v. Freeman · McClanahan v. Louisiana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . ‘[S]ection 1443 does not make the federal courts the sole keepers of the constitutional conscience. The statute does not authorize removal to protect the broad guarantees of the constitution.’ Miller v. Wade, 420 F.2d 489 at 490 (5th Cir. 1969). The Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial is just such a broad constitutional guarantee, of general application to all citizens, and not, in the language of the removal statute, a ‘law providing for the equal civil rights of citizens * * City of Greenwood, Mississippi v. Peacock, 384 U.S. 808 , 86 S.Ct. 1800 , 16 L.Ed.2d 944 (1966); State of Georgia v. Rachel, 384 U.S. 780 , 86 S.Ct. 1783 , 16 L.Ed.2d 925 (1966); and McClanahan v. State of Louisiana, 399 F.2d 695 (5th Cir. 1968).” -”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.