Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

429 F.2d 1321

Docket No. 28679.

Bailey v. Dixon

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1970.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1970-06-30

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently April 1990

15 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Jolly v. Gorman · Bailey v. Dixon

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1970-06-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*1322See also D.C., 314 F.Supp. 452.

¶2Julius Miller, Gleason & Miller, New York City, Joseph W. Cole, Jr., Port Allen, La., for defendants-appellants.

¶3Joseph A. Gladney, Johnnie Jones, Baton Rouge, La., for plaintiffs-appellees.

¶4Before THORNBERRY, COLEMAN and INGRAHAM, Circuit Judges.

¶5PER CURIAM:

¶6This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana temporarily enjoining the International Longshoremen’s Association from imposing a trusteeship over Local Union No. 1830.

¶7In Jolly v. Gorman, 5th Cir. 1970, 428 F.2d 960, this Court held that a valid trusteeship must be authorized or ratified after a fair hearing. It is clear in this case that the trusteeship imposed on Local No. 1830 was not authorized by a fair hearing, but the International argues that because it could have later ratified the trusteeship by a fair hearing, the trial judge should not have issued the preliminary injunction. This is an issue that must be decided on the facts of each case, and we have determined that there is nothing in the record of this case showing an abuse of discretion by the district judge; and therefore his allowance of a preliminary injunction is affirmed.

/429/f2d/1321 · .json · Public domain