Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 429 F.2d 138 - United States v. Stone

United States v. Stone’s Empirical Analysis

429 F.2d 138 · 1970

Citation profile

130
cited by 130 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
10
states following
October 2020
most recently cited

71 federal appellate · 5 district · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 130 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2020 · most notably United States v. Calandra (1974), United States v. Dionisio (1973)

71 federal appellate · 5 district · 16 state decisions — followed in 10 states

690197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1621 · 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 186 (§ 302 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))

Relies on Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. City of Dallas · Consolidated Gas Electric Light & Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Water & Power Co. · Campbell v. United States · United States v. Citizens Utilities Co. · United States v. Marchisio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 130 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A grand jury's investigation is not fully carried out until every available clue has been run down and all witnesses examined in every proper way to find if a crime has been committed....”
    16 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'the natural effect or tendency to impede, influence or dissuade the Grand Jury from pursuing its investigation.'”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.