Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 429 F.2d 269 - Fernando Rodriguez, Jr. v. The Honorable Archie S. Brown

Fernando Rodriguez, Jr. v. The Honorable Archie S. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

429 F.2d 269 · 1970

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
May 1975
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Snowden v. Hughes · Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections Butts · Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15 · Ex parte Poresky · Samuel Bailey v. Joe T. Patterson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"As the petitioner acknowledges, the Texas system of selecting grand and petit jurors by the use of jury commissions is fair on its face and capable of being utilized without discrimination. But as this Court has held, the system is susceptible to abuse and can be employed in a discriminatory manner. The exclusion of otherwise eligible persons from jury service solely because of their ancestry or national origin is discrimination prohibited by the Fourteenth Amendment. The Texas statute makes no such discrimination, but the petitioner alleges that those administering the law do."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"Here, the Texas statutory scheme is not in itself unfair. * * * But by reason of the wide discretion permissible in the various steps of the plan, it is equally capable of being applied in such a manner as practically to proscribe any group thought by the law's administrators to be undesirable."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.