Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 429 F.2d 407 - United States v. Thomas

United States v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

429 F.2d 407 · 1970

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
December 2005
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002)

Relies on Kann v. United States · Parr v. United States · American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. · Adams v. United States · Warden v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a)n appellate court will not review actions of omission or commission by a trial court unless the defendant makes known to the court the action which he desires the court to take or his objection to the action taken by the court and the grounds therefor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.