Farkas v. Texas Instruments, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
429 F.2d 849 · 1970
Citation profile
27 federal appellate · 8 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently December 2016 · most notably Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co. (1977), Hayes v. New England Millwork Distributors, Inc. (1979)
27 federal appellate · 8 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Foman v. Davis · Middle Atlantic Utilities Co. v. S. M. W. Development Corp. · Farkas v. Texas Instrument, Inc. · Seymour v. Parke, Davis & Co. · Caso v. Lafayette Radio Electronics Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in the absence of any apparent or declared reason—such as undue delay, bad faith or dilatory motive on the part of the movant, repeated failure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed, undue prejudice to the opposing party by virtue of allowance of the amendment [or] futility of the amendment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.