Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 429 F.2d 928 - United States v. Navarro

United States v. Navarro’s Empirical Analysis

429 F.2d 928 · 1970

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
May 1993
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently May 1993

18 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

170197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Elkins v. United States · Wolf v. People of the State of Colorado · Ponzi v. Fessenden · Stefanelli v. Minard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “unconstitutional” characterization, for it is contrary to our holding in Navarro II that "the search and seizure was conducted in accordance with constitutional mandates. Only the more stringent federal rules were violated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.