Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

429 F.2d 983

Docket Nos. 25618, 25643.

United States of America, and v. Noel Brown, United States of America, and v. Sylvester Riley

Full caption · 2 consolidated cases

  • UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff andv.Noel BROWN
  • UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff andv.Sylvester RILEY

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1970-09-09

3 counsel of record

Relies on United States v. Tropiano · Doty v. United States · Dryden v. United States

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1970-09-09

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Warren J. Ferguson, Judge.

¶1

Carl E. Stewart, Los Angeles, Cal., for Brown.

¶2

Joseph T. Vodnoy, Los Angeles, Cal., for Riley.

¶3

Robert L. Meyer, U.S. Atty., David R. Nissen, Chief, Criminal Division, Brian J. O'Neill, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

¶4

Before CHAMBERS and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and PECKHAM, District judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶5

The judgments of conviction are affirmed.

¶6

We find no illegally 'seized' evidence as a matter of law, no illegal search under the circumstances, and find adequate evidence to support the verdict.

¶7

On the first contention the court accepts United States v. Polansky, 418 F.2d 444 (2d Cir., 1969); United States v. Tropiano, 418 F.2d 1069 (2d Cir., 1969); Doty v. United States, 416 F.2d 887 (10th Cir., 1968); and Dryden v. United States, 391 F.2d 214 (5th Cir., 1968).

/429/f2d/983 · .json · Public domain