Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 429 F.3d 1165 - Neal v. Fields

Neal v. Fields’s Empirical Analysis

429 F.3d 1165 · 2005

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Siegert v. Gilley · Town of Castle Rock v. Gonzales · Barry v. Barchi · Pacheco-Medina v. Oregon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “However, Neal's complaint fails to allege a deprivation of her constitutionally protected property interest. Her license has not been suspended, as was the horse trainer's license in Barry v. Barchi . Thus, her right to practice nursing in Arkansas remains intact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “21 The procedural component of the Due Process Clause protects property interests created not by the Constitution but by”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “`rules or understandings that stem from an independent source such as state law.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.