Feder v. Electronic Data Systems Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
429 F.3d 125 · 2005
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently May 2023 · most notably Vega v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. (2009), 40 Cal. 4th 1069 - Fireside Bank v. Superior Court (2007)
15 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor · Castano v. American Tobacco Co. · Allison v. Citgo Petroleum Corp. · Horton ex rel. Horton v. Goose Creek Independent School District · Unger v. Amedisys Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“I, Suzanne Saville, declare as follows:. 1. I respectfully submit this declaration in support of Lead Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification. I have personal knowledge of the statements herein and, if called upon as a witness, could and would competently testify thereto. 2. I am the Chair of the Board of Trustees of the Nursing Homes and Related Industries Pension Plan ("the Plan”), Lead Plaintiff in this action. I have participated in the Plan’s decision making with respect to litigation matters, and have participated in supervising outside legal counsel in the Plan's pending litigation. As Chair of the Board of Trustees of the Plan, I am authorized to seek the Plan’s appointment as Class Representative in this action. 3. The Plan is a target-benefit, multi-employer pension plan. As of January 31, 2013, the Plan had 437 contributing employers, nearly 50,-000 members, more than 6,000 retirees, and more than $1 billion in assets. According to its records, the Plan purchased 72,600 shares of Kosmos common stock on May 10, 2011. See Appendix of Exhibits in Support of the Plan’s Opposition to the Competing Motions for Appointment as Lead Plaintiff, Ex. 1 (Dkt. No. 62-1). 4. The Plan understands that the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 was intended to encourage institutional investors to seek to direct securities class actions. The Plan is an institutional investor committed to vigorously prosecuting this litigation. The Plan intends to obtain the largest recov”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The share of any final judgment or of any settlement that is awarded to a representative party serving on behalf of a class shall be equal, on a per share basis, to the portion of the final judgment or settlement awarded to all other members of the class. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to limit the award of reasonable costs and expenses (including lost wages) directly relating to the representation of the class to any representative party serving on behalf of a class. 92”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) the class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable; (2) there are questions of law or fact common to the class; (3) the claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class; and (4) the representative parties will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.