Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 429 F.3d 438 - United States of America v. Acorn Technology Fund Lp

United States of America v. Acorn Technology Fund Lp’s Empirical Analysis

429 F.3d 438 · 2005

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
September 2011
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Gaubert · Berkovitz v. United States · Gennari v. Weichert Co. Realtors · American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Winback & Conserve Program, Inc. · Banco Popular North America v. Gandi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] receiver must be given a chance to do the important job of marshaling and untangling a company's assets without being forced into court by every investor or claimant.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the interests of the Receiver are very-broad and include not only protection of the receivership res, but also protection of defrauded investors and considerations of judicial economy. This is a corollary of the district court’s power to enter a blanket stay. This power is broader than the court’s authority to grant or deny injunctive relief under Fed.R.Civ.P. 65.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(1) [W]hether refusing to lift the stay genuinely preserves the status quo or whether the moving party will suffer substantial injury if not permitted to proceed; (2) the time in the course of the receivership at which the motion for relief from the stay is made; and (3) the merit of the moving party’s underlying claim.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.