United States v. Olis’s Empirical Analysis
429 F.3d 540 · 2005
Citation profile
39 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably United States v. Gomez-Herrera (2008), United States v. Freeman (2005)
39 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78U (§ 21d of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on United States v. Booker · McMillan v. Pennsylvania · Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Broudo · United States v. Kikumura · United States v. Akpan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[s]o long as there is evidence that the conspiracy continued after the effective date of the [amendments to the] guidelines, the Ex Post Facto Clause is not violated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“extremely sophisticated, but fraudulent, scheme”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.