Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 429 F.3d 673 - United States v. Cunningham

United States v. Cunningham’s Empirical Analysis

429 F.3d 673 · 2005

Citation profile

383
cited by 383 later decisions
1
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

223 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 383 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably United States v. Cooper (2006), United States v. Tomko (2009)

223 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

2170200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 991

Relies on United States v. Booker · United States v. Scott · United States v. Mykytiuk · United States v. Crawford · United States v. Webb

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 383 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e have to satisfy ourselves, before we can conclude that the judge did not abuse his discretion, that he exercised his discretion, that is, that he considered the factors relevant to that exercise.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a] judge who fails to mention a ground of recognized legal merit (provided it has a factual basis) is likely to have committed an error or oversight.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[a] sentencing judge has no more duty than we appellate judges do to discuss every argument made by a litigant; arguments clearly without merit can, and for the sake of judicial economy should, be passed over in silence.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.