429 F. App'x 218 - Perry v. Computer Sciences Corporation’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 2612 (§ 102 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 29 U.S.C. § 2615 (§ 105 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993)
Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · Laber v. Harvey · Myers v. Hose · Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Clay Printing Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must show by a preponderance of the evidence that the proffered reason was a pretext for discrimination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hannah P. v. Coats
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.