Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 429 F. Supp. 313 - Bryan v. Amrep Corp.

429 F. Supp. 313 - Bryan v. Amrep Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
2
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 7 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably Sikes v. Teleline, Inc. (2002), Life Insurance Co. of Southwest v. Brister (1986)

2 federal appellate · 7 district · 3 state decisions

11019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1703 · 15 U.S.C. § 1709 (Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 15 U.S.C. § 1711 · 15 U.S.C. § 57B (Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914)

Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States · Brady v. United States · Blackie v. Barrack · Green v. Wolf Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “obtain money or property by means of a material misrepresentation with respect to any information included in the statement of record or the property report or with respect to any other information pertinent to the lot or the subdivision and upon which the purchaser relies,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the court finds that the questions of law or fact common to the members of the class predominate over any questions affecting only individual members, and that a class action is superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of the controversy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a plaintiff is not required to prove that each purchaser relied in some way on the omission or misrepresentation but only that a material misrepresentation or omission existed in the statement of record at the time the property was sold.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.