Commonwealth v. Larkin’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
6 district · 63 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably Commonwealth v. DiGiambattista (2004), Commonwealth v. Groome (2001)
6 district · 63 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Rhode Island v. Innis · Berkemer v. McCarty · Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos. · Oregon v. Elstad
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The question ... is not whether a person is in custody in some abstract sense or for some other purpose, but whether he is in custody in the sense that implicates the concerns motivating the Miranda rule in the first place.”); State v. Tibiatowski, 590 N.W.2d 305, 309 (Minn. 1999) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“any words or actions on the part of the police (other than those normally attendant to arrest and custody) that the police should know are reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response from the suspect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a reasonable person in the suspect's shoes would experience the environment in which the interrogation took place as coercive.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.