Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 429 MASS 658 - Commonwealth v. Gonsalves

Commonwealth v. Gonsalves’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

133
cited by 133 later decisions
5
states following
March 2020
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 4 district · 126 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 133 later decisions — most recently March 2020 · most notably Commonwealth v. Jimenez (2002), State v. Sprague (2003)

3 federal appellate · 4 district · 126 state decisions

7601999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Pennsylvania v. Mimms · Maryland v. Wilson · Knowles v. Iowa · New York v. Class

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 133 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it does not take much for a police officer to establish a reasonable basis to justify an exit order or search based on safety concerns.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “`Citizens do not expect that police officers handling a routine traffic violation will engage, in the absence of justification, in stalling tactics, obfuscation, strained conversation, or unjustified exit orders, to prolong the seizure in the hope that, sooner or later, the stop might yield up some evidence of an arrestable crime.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “a reasonably prudent man in the policeman's position would be warranted in such a belief.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.