Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 429 N.E.2d 666 - Nash v. State

Nash v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
November 2014
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently November 2014

13 state decisions

601981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bordenkircher v. Hayes · White v. United States · Bonanno v. United States · German v. State · Neeley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"a threat by a prosecutor to do what the law will not permit, if it motivates a defendant ignorant of the impossibility, renders the plea involuntary." Nash, supra, at 671 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In the instant case, Nash was a 30 year old man facing a possibility of a substantial amount of time being tacked on to his sentence by virtue of the improper habitual offender counts. Even if we accept the proposition that this was not the 'main' motivation for his guilty plea, the uncontradicted testimony leads unerringly to the conclusion that it played a significant part in the plea negotiations and therefore rendered the bargain illusory.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(b) After he has been convicted and sentenced for a felony committed after sentencing for a prior unrelated felony conviction, a person has accumulated two (2) prior unrelated felony convictions. However, a conviction does not count for purposes of this subsection if: (1) it has been set aside; or (2) it is one for which the person has been pardoned.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.