State v. Bishop’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on DiProspero v. Penn · State v. Natale · State v. Lagares · State v. Vasquez · State v. Baylass
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“address in a new and innovative way the problem of drug-dependent offenders caught in a never-ending cycle of involvement in the criminal justice system.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“first appeared in that section when it was amended in 1999. Meyer, supra, 192 N.J. at 434 . . . . [T]hat amendment, together with subsequent amendments, set special probation apart from regular probation, rendering each a separate and distinct sentencing disposition authorized by the Code. Special probation is designed to divert otherwise prison-bound offenders into an intensive and highly specialized form of probation designed to”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.