Valerio v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
39 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently September 2019 · most notably Smith v. Superior Court (1968), Crozier v. State (1986)
39 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board · Gideon v. Cochran · 10 Cal. 2d 138 - People v. Gidney · State v. Lindsay · Hughes v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * The objection of incompetency, irrelevancy, and immateriality is not sufficiently specific to raise any question for decision; [citations]. The objector should lay his finger on the particular point intended to be raised so that the trial court will have notice and an opportunity to cure the alleged error. It follows that there was no error in the trial court’s overruling of defendant’s objection.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““Our court, in State v. Lindsay, 77 Wyo. 410 , 317 P.2d 506, 510 , recognized that evidence is not to be excluded because it tends to show the commission of other offenses ‘where it tends to prove facts material in the trial.’ ” Valerio v. State, Wyo., 429 P.2d 317, 318 (1967).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Crozier v. State“[Ilt is incumbent upon the complaining party to point out with definiteness and particularity the error of which he complains, so that the trial court may pass upon the exact question”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sanderson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.