Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 1968
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 93 Okla. Crim. 106 - Ex Parte Hunt · 75 Okla. Crim. 183 - Ex Parte W. H. Seale · 94 Okla. Crim. 270 - Ex Parte McCombs · Application of Jones
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where petition for habeas corpus is filed, the burden is upon the petitioner to prove grounds upon which he relies for his release, and the unsupported statements of a petitioner do not meet the requirements of the proof.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Day v. Page
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.