Harper v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 100 Wash. 2d 421 - Petersen v. State · 118 Wash. 2d 195 - Taggart v. State · 125 Wash. 2d 697 - Ruff v. County of King · HERTOG, EX REL., SAH v. City of Seattle · 85 Wash. 2d 154 - LaPlante v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“grant [of] summary judgment when 'there are no genuine issues of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“consider 'facts and reasonable inferences from the facts . . . in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.