Larkins v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
states following
September 2025
most recently cited
36 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Berger v. United States · Grupo Mexicano Desarrollos v. Alliance Bond Fund Inc · Stirone v. United States · United States v. Dominguez Benitez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“evaluate[ ] counsel under the circumstances existing at the time of the challenged act or omission and from the perspective available at the time of the challenged act or omission.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Dixon v. State · Wall v. State“(1) the alleged error clearly appears in the record; (2) the alleged error clearly and obviously violates a clear and unequivocal rule of law; and (3) the alleged error affects a substantial right”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Dixon v. State · Nielsen v. State“reasonable probability that the result would have been more favorable to the defendant had the error not occurred.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Hopkins v. State · Nielsen v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.