Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 429 P3D 301 - Williams v. State

Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
3
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

19 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Wainwright v. Witt · Hernandez v. New York · Purkett v. Elem · Miller-El v. Dretke

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the disproportionate effect of peremptory strikes, the nature of the proponent's questions and statements during voir dire, disparate treatment of members of the targeted group, and whether the case itself is sensitive to bias.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “To establish a prima facie case under step one, the opponent of the strike must show that the totality of the relevant facts gives rise to an inference of discriminatory purpose.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “heading] SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3 (0) 947A e). argument and determin [ing] whether the opponent of the peremptory strike has proven purposeful discrimination.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.