Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 429 P3D 467 - State v. Jefferson

State v. Jefferson’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
4
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

21 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Batson v. Kentucky · Landgraf v. USI Film Products · Washington v. Davis · Swain v. State of Alabama

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the juror had specific knowledge of the movie 12 Angry Men, and the juror in a prior trial had brought into jury deliberations outside discussions. Id. at 472 . The Jefferson court first concluded that, under Batson , there would be no violation. Id. The Jefferson court also concluded that Washington's new rule related to jury selection would not apply to the proceeding. Id. at 477 . But the Jefferson court proceeded to apply a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “an objective observer could view race or ethnicity as a factor in the use of the peremptory challenge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “If the court determines that an objective observer could view race or ethnicity as a factor,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.