Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 429 P3D 776 - State v. Scherf

State v. Scherf’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Blakely v. Washington · Arizona v. Fulminante · Hudson v. Palmer · Sandin v. Conner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.