429 So. 2d 1104 - Raines v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
38 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently December 2000 · most notably 577 So. 2d 474 - Kuenzel v. State (1990), 494 So. 2d 124 - Magwood v. State (1985)
38 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Agurs · Beck v. Washington · United States Ex Rel. Darcy v. Handy · 396 So. 2d 645 - Beck v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"`Even where there is total non disclosure of information the test is whether the use of the information at trial would have changed the result by creating a reasonable doubt where one did not otherwise exist. United States v. Agurs , 427 U.S. 97 , 96 S.Ct. 2392 , 49 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976); Jones v. State , 396 So.2d 140 (Ala.Cr.App. 1981). As the United States Supreme Court stated in Beck v. Washington , 369 U.S. 541 , 558 , 82 S.Ct. 955 , 964 , 8 L.Ed.2d 98 (1962): "`"While this Court stands ready to correct violations of constitutional rights, it also holds that it is not asking too much that the burden of showing essential unfairness be sustained by him who claims such injustice and seeks to have the result set aside, and that it be sustained not as a matter of speculation but as a demonstrable reality. United States ex rel. Darcy v. Handy , 351 U.S. 454 , 462 [ 76 S.Ct. 965 , 970 , 100 L.Ed. 1331 ] (1956).'" "Raines v. State , 429 So.2d 1104 (Ala.Cr.App.), affirmed, 429 So.2d 1111 (Ala. 1982)."”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“'There is no requirement in establishing a prima facie case of robbery that the property stolen belonged to the robbery victim. . . . There is no material variance between an indictment which charges that the property taken was the personal property of a named individual and proof showing that the property belonged to another. . . .' (citations omitted). Raines v. State , 429 So.2d 1104 , 1106 (Ala.Cr.App.), affirmed, Ex parte Raines , 429 So.2d 1111 (Ala. 1982), cert. denied 460 U.S. 1103 , 103 S.Ct. 1804 , 76 L.Ed.2d 368 (1983).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he defendant was previously convicted of another capital felony or a felony involving the use or threat of violence to the person.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.