Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

429 So. 2d 172

State v. Marshall

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 18, 1983

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 1983-03-18

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 1995

1 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“Denied. In the event a new trial is not granted, relator may reurge these arguments on appeal. The sealed evidence shall be preserved for this purpose.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 660 So. 2d 819 - State v. Marshall

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1983-03-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1In re Charles Marshall, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and stay order. Orleans Parish. No. 282-382.

¶2Denied. In the event a new trial is not granted, relator may reurge these arguments on appeal. The sealed evidence shall be preserved for this purpose.

/429/so2d/172 · .json · Public domain