429 So. 2d 388 - Thompson v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 2015
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hasle v. Maasbrock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(3) ... Any party may file objections to the report of the commissioners .... If no objections are filed or if the court is satisfied' on hearing any such objections that they are not well-founded, the report shall be confirmed, and a final judgment entered vesting in the parties the title to the parcels of the lands allotted to them -respectively, and giving each of them the possession of and quieting title to their respective shares as against the other parties to the action or those claiming through or under them.” (4) ... On an uncontested allegation in a pleading that the property sought’ to be partitioned is indivisible and is not subject to partition without prejudice to the owners of it or if a judgment of partition is entered and the court is satisfied that the allegation is correct, on motion of any party and notice to the others the court may appoint a special magistrate or the clerk to make sale of the property either at private sale or as provided by s. 64.071.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Crusaw v. Crusaw
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.