Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 429 SO2D 45 - Golden v. State

Golden v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
July 2017
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 2017

11 state decisions

501983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harris v. New York · Agnello v. United States · Walder v. United States · Oregon v. Hass · Bowsher v. Merck & Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the jury... be left to contend with authentic tape recordings that are difficult to understand without the sense of sight or some other aid to understanding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.