Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 429 So. 2d 747 - State v. Cardinal

429 So. 2d 747 - State v. Cardinal’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 1986
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Perez. v. Campbell · South Dakota v. Neville · Harrell v. State · 340 So. 2d 922 - Ingram v. Pettit · 81 So. 2d 739 - Gibbs v. Mayo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is unlawful for any person, while in an intoxicated condition or under the influence of intoxicating liquor, model glue, as defined in s. 877.11, or any substance controlled under chapter 893 to such extent as to deprive him of full possession of his normal faculties, to drive or operate over the highways, streets, or thoroughfares of Florida any automobile, truck, motorcycle, or other vehicle. Any person convicted of a violation of this section shall be punished as provided in s. 316.193.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.