Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 429 U.S. 1004 - Roanwell Corp. v. Plantronics, Inc.

Roanwell Corp. v. Plantronics, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

171
cited by 171 later decisions
7
states following
December 2003
most recently cited

101 federal appellate · 12 district · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 171 later decisions — most recently December 2003 · most notably United States v. Bright (1980), United States v. Heldt (1981)

101 federal appellate · 12 district · 22 state decisions

8501976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 35 U.S.C. § 103

Relies on Graham v. John Deere Company of Kansas City Calmar Inc · Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp. · Anderson's-Black Rock, Inc. v. Pavement Salvage Co. · Julia Hotchkiss Executrix of John Hotchkiss Deceased John Davenport and John Quincy v. Miles Greenwood · Sakraida v. Ag Pro, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 171 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Thus, to be patentable, a combination of elements must produce something more than the sum of the pre-existing elements; there must be a synergistic result that is itself nonobvious(ness).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.